ME 469: Group Evaluation
For an individual project, a group will submit only one report,
which will be graded. At the end of the term, you will be asked
to rank yourself and each other group member by indicating the
degree to which each member fulfilled his or her responsibilities
in completing the projects. These ratings should reflect each
individual's level of participation and effort and sense of
responsibility, not his or her academic ability.
- Excellent: consistently went above and beyond; tutored teammates,
routinely went above and beyond the basic team
responsibilities.
- Very good: consistently did what he or she was
supposed to do and was very well prepared and cooperative.
- Satisfactory: usually did what he or she was
supposed to do, was acceptably prepared and cooperative.
- Ordinary: often did what he or she was supposed to
do, and was minimally prepared and cooperative.
- Marginal: sometimes failed to show up or complete
assignments and was rarely prepared.
- Deficient: often failed to show up or complete
assignments and was rarely prepared.
- Unsatisfactory: consistently failed to show up or
complete assignments was consistently unprepared.
- Superficial: practically no participation.
- No show: no participation at all.
Return to the ME 469 Homepage.
Return to the ME 469 Syllabus.
Last updated: August 12, 1998.
B. Goodwine (jgoodwin@nd.edu)