- For the case where
- Determine the solution in the case where
- Sketch by hand what this solution will look like qualitatively.
- When the forcing frequency is very close, but not exactly equal, to the natural frequency which solution (the solution you just determined or the one from class) is correct? Sketch what the correct solution will look like qualitatively.
- Determine the solution when
- Assume for this problem that there is gravity.
- Derive the equations of motion when x is measured from the unstretched position of the spring.
- Show that the equation of motion for the system is
- For damped unforced (F(t)=0) oscillations, we showed in class that the (homogeneous) solution to the equation given at the top of the page is
- Determine the (homogeneous) solution when
- Determine the (homogeneous) solution when
- For the damped unforced oscillation case where
- For the system given by the equation at the top of the page,
- determine the solution when m=1, b=0.25, k=2, x(0)=2, dx/dt(0)=0 and F(t)=0; and,
- write a computer program to solve it using Euler's method and submit plots of the numerical solution and the exact solution for the same time interval.
Homework 5, due September 29, 2004
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
- Contact:
Homework 5, due September 29, 2004
We love the system illustrated in the following figure so much that we are going to solve every reasonable permutation of it. The reason we love it so much is, of course, that it is so broadly applicable to many important engineering problems that entire text books are devoted to it.
Last edited by goodwine on Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gravity in problem 3
For problem 3 are we to assume that gravity is the only force acting on the system, or is there still an Focoswt force?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
- Contact:
Re: Gravity in problem 3
There is still an applied F(t), but it really doesn't matter too much. It just kind of goes along for the ride. The point of the problem is that g disappears if you measure the system from the equilibrium configuration, i.e., stretched by mg/k.NDChevy07 wrote:For problem 3 are we to assume that gravity is the only force acting on the system, or is there still an Focoswt force?
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
Problem 3a
For problem 3a, are we still supposed to assume that b=0 and F(t)=Fo*cos(w*t)?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
- Contact:
Re: Problem 3a
No, assume b isn't zero and F(t) is just unsepcified, i.e., keep it just as "F(t)." The point of the problem is that if you measure it using x then there is an mg in the problem, but if you use y there isn't.wgallag1 wrote:For problem 3a, are we still supposed to assume that b=0 and F(t)=Fo*cos(w*t)?
A couple people came to my office hours and were worried about this problem because it seemed too short. There really isn't too much to it -- both parts are only one or two lines.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick