Page 1 of 1

Homework 5, due September 29, 2004

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 2:08 pm
by goodwine
We love the system illustrated in the following figure so much that we are going to solve every reasonable permutation of it. The reason we love it so much is, of course, that it is so broadly applicable to many important engineering problems that entire text books are devoted to it.
    • Image
Unless otherwise indicated, assume there is no gravity and that x is measured from the unstretched position of the spring. In this case, the equations of motion are
    • Image
  1. For the case where
    • Image
    we showed in class that
    • Image
    as long as
    • Image
    1. Determine the solution in the case where
      • Image
    2. Sketch by hand what this solution will look like qualitatively.
    3. When the forcing frequency is very close, but not exactly equal, to the natural frequency which solution (the solution you just determined or the one from class) is correct? Sketch what the correct solution will look like qualitatively.
  2. Determine the solution when
    • Image
    Indicate whether it matters if
    • Image
    If it does matter, then you may assume that the inequality is true.
  3. Assume for this problem that there is gravity.
    1. Derive the equations of motion when x is measured from the unstretched position of the spring.
    2. Show that the equation of motion for the system is
      • Image
      when y is measured from the static equilibrium of the system, i.e., under gravity the weight of the mass would stretch the spring by an amount x=mg/k so y=x-mg/k.
    The significance of this is that even if there is gravity, we can neglect is as long as the position of the mass is measured from the position of static deflection of the spring due to the weight of the mass.
  4. For damped unforced (F(t)=0) oscillations, we showed in class that the (homogeneous) solution to the equation given at the top of the page is
    • Image
    as long as
    • Image
    1. Determine the (homogeneous) solution when
      • Image
    2. Determine the (homogeneous) solution when
      • Image
  5. For the damped unforced oscillation case where
    • Image
    plot the solution for
    • Image
    for the time interval t=0 to t=10. Plot all the curves on the same plot.
  6. For the system given by the equation at the top of the page,
    1. determine the solution when m=1, b=0.25, k=2, x(0)=2, dx/dt(0)=0 and F(t)=0; and,
    2. write a computer program to solve it using Euler's method and submit plots of the numerical solution and the exact solution for the same time interval.

Gravity in problem 3

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:06 pm
by NDChevy07
For problem 3 are we to assume that gravity is the only force acting on the system, or is there still an Focoswt force?

Re: Gravity in problem 3

Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:14 pm
by goodwine
NDChevy07 wrote:For problem 3 are we to assume that gravity is the only force acting on the system, or is there still an Focoswt force?
There is still an applied F(t), but it really doesn't matter too much. It just kind of goes along for the ride. The point of the problem is that g disappears if you measure the system from the equilibrium configuration, i.e., stretched by mg/k.

Problem 3a

Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:44 pm
by wgallag1
For problem 3a, are we still supposed to assume that b=0 and F(t)=Fo*cos(w*t)?

Re: Problem 3a

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:34 am
by goodwine
wgallag1 wrote:For problem 3a, are we still supposed to assume that b=0 and F(t)=Fo*cos(w*t)?
No, assume b isn't zero and F(t) is just unsepcified, i.e., keep it just as "F(t)." The point of the problem is that if you measure it using x then there is an mg in the problem, but if you use y there isn't.

A couple people came to my office hours and were worried about this problem because it seemed too short. There really isn't too much to it -- both parts are only one or two lines.

poll

Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 11:42 pm
by acrutchf
so which is it? which band haven't you seen?

Re: poll

Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:06 am
by goodwine
acrutchf wrote:so which is it? which band haven't you seen?
Metallica