## Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

Due Wednesday, October 2, 2013.
goodwine
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
Contact:

### Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

Exercises: 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.7, 4.9, 4.12, 4.14 and 4.15.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
jnorby

### Re: Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

For 4.3 part 1), would it be acceptable to leave c1 and c2 in the homogeneous part of the solutions, rather than finding them in terms of x-nought and x-dot-nought? It seems like a lot of algebra otherwise.
goodwine
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
Contact:

### Re: Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

jnorby wrote:For 4.3 part 1), would it be acceptable to leave c1 and c2 in the homogeneous part of the solutions, rather than finding them in terms of x-nought and x-dot-nought? It seems like a lot of algebra otherwise.
No, but in the grand scheme of things it wouldn't be the craziest decision to skip it and take a very small point penalty.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
jbruns2

### Re: Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

For problem 4.3 part 4, my plot shifts up to 1.5 at r=1. This does not look like the figure of the phase shift in the chapter, so how does the phase shift continue to decrease to less than -1.5 after the ratio becomes greater than 1?
goodwine
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
Contact:

### Re: Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

jbruns2 wrote:For problem 4.3 part 4, my plot shifts up to 1.5 at r=1. This does not look like the figure of the phase shift in the chapter, so how does the phase shift continue to decrease to less than -1.5 after the ratio becomes greater than 1?
That's a result of the tan^{-1} function you are using. Check what it's returning by default.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
jsoisson

### Re: Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

Prof. Goodwine,

Would it be a valid assumption for this and future assignments that for where the problem asks to "graph" a solution it is acceptable to turn in a MATLAB plot, and when it asks to "sketch" a solution it is not? Thanks.
goodwine
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
Contact:

### Re: Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

jsoisson wrote:Prof. Goodwine,

Would it be a valid assumption for this and future assignments that for where the problem asks to "graph" a solution it is acceptable to turn in a MATLAB plot, and when it asks to "sketch" a solution it is not? Thanks.
Yes, that's a good way to put it.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
John Hollkamp

### Re: Homework 4, due October 2, 2013

I have two questions: For problem 4.6, should the omegas be different from one another; that is should they have subscripts associated with them? And for 4.9, do we assume the same initial conditions as in problem 4.3 and then found the solution for three different zeta cases?
goodwine