1/26/11 (Robins): Difference between revisions
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Hotchkiss v Greenwood tells us the overall result must be greater than the sum of the parts. Using a new material in this case was equivalent to the work that a skilled mechanic..." |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 17:08, 26 January 2011
Hotchkiss v Greenwood tells us the overall result must be greater than the sum of the parts. Using a new material in this case was equivalent to the work that a skilled mechanic could perform. Therefore the patent was invalid.
