Kemnetz: GE Turbine Case & Catheter Case 04/13/2011: Difference between revisions
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "* issue about springs, GE used diff springs & thought they were good to go, but court said no * then there's the issue of geometry (where GE is winning in this case) b/c claims ..." |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 16:17, 13 April 2011
- issue about springs, GE used diff springs & thought they were good to go, but court said no
- then there's the issue of geometry (where GE is winning in this case) b/c claims were modified to further distinguish based on prior art, if your original claims can't back your amendments, you lose your original filing date.
