Graham v. John Deere (KyleR): Difference between revisions
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
***ruled valid by District Court and Court of Appeals | ***ruled valid by District Court and Court of Appeals | ||
***ruled invalid by Supreme Court. | ***ruled invalid by Supreme Court. | ||
History of Patent Law | History of Patent Law |
Revision as of 01:12, 31 January 2011
Overview
- Decided by U.S. Supreme Court in 1966.
- Two patent-infringement claims being debated:
- No. 11: "Clamp for vibrating shank plows"
- 1955 - ruled valid by Fifth Circuit. The combination produces an old result in a cheaper, more effective way
- 1964 - ruled invalid by Eight Circuit. The combination provides no new result
- 1966 - ruled invalid by Supreme Court. But neither Circuit applied the correct test
- No. 11: "Clamp for vibrating shank plows"
- No. 37 and No. 43: a built-in plastic finger sprayer with a "hold-down" cap for insecticide dispensing. Patent issued to Cook Chemical.
- ruled valid by District Court and Court of Appeals
- ruled invalid by Supreme Court.
- No. 37 and No. 43: a built-in plastic finger sprayer with a "hold-down" cap for insecticide dispensing. Patent issued to Cook Chemical.
History of Patent Law
- Congress is given the power to issue patents/monopolies, but that power is limited.
- must "promote the Progress of ... useful Arts".
- cannot remove or restrict access to existing knowledge from the public domain.
- Thomas Jefferson, who authored the 1793 Patent Act, did not intend for patents to be granted for "small details, obvious improvements, or frivolous devices"
- Congress and Jefferson agreed that is should be up to the courts to develop detailed standards for patentability
- 1851 - Hotchkiss - device must require more skill than that possessed by an ordinary mechanic