Printed Publication (HW 3-23) (RCTA): Difference between revisions
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Assignment: Use the West KeyCite system to find another case dealing with a different type of "Printed Publication" such as advertisements, computer manuals, etc. Try to find one..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<p> I think you don't want to use the "k. Requisites of Publication" necessarily, but probably the one right above it. Create a wiki page with a one-paragraph description of the facts of the case and the holding. Be sure to include which court it was. </p> | <p> I think you don't want to use the "k. Requisites of Publication" necessarily, but probably the one right above it. Create a wiki page with a one-paragraph description of the facts of the case and the holding. Be sure to include which court it was. </p> | ||
==MEHL/Biophile International Corp. v. Milgraum== | |||
* United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | |||
* Plaintiffs-Appellants: MEHL/Biophile International Corp., Selvac Acquisitions Corp. and Nardo Zaias, M.D. | |||
* Defendants-Appellees: Sandy Milgraum, M.D., Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., and Spectrum Medical Technologies, Inc. | |||
* Date: Sept. 30, 1999 (Rehearing denied Oct. 27, 1999) | |||
==Holding== | |||
# Patent was not anticipated by instruction manual for laser used to remove tattoos | |||
# Patent was anticipated by prior art article. | |||
==Summary== | |||
Revision as of 17:32, 22 March 2011
Assignment: Use the West KeyCite system to find another case dealing with a different type of "Printed Publication" such as advertisements, computer manuals, etc. Try to find one that is different and interesting, i.e., not the first one that comes up on the list.
I think you don't want to use the "k. Requisites of Publication" necessarily, but probably the one right above it. Create a wiki page with a one-paragraph description of the facts of the case and the holding. Be sure to include which court it was.
MEHL/Biophile International Corp. v. Milgraum
- United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
- Plaintiffs-Appellants: MEHL/Biophile International Corp., Selvac Acquisitions Corp. and Nardo Zaias, M.D.
- Defendants-Appellees: Sandy Milgraum, M.D., Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., and Spectrum Medical Technologies, Inc.
- Date: Sept. 30, 1999 (Rehearing denied Oct. 27, 1999)
Holding
- Patent was not anticipated by instruction manual for laser used to remove tattoos
- Patent was anticipated by prior art article.
