NOVELTY: Difference between revisions

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
A good discussion of the printed publication bar is in  
A good discussion of the printed publication bar is in  
*[[In re Hall]] (CAFC 1986): which considered whether a doctoral thesis was a printed publication [[In re Hall (full text)]];
*[[In re Hall]] (CAFC 1986): which considered whether a doctoral thesis was a printed publication [[In re Hall (full text)]];
*
*[[Universal Athletic Sales v. American Gym]] considered whether a picture in a magazine constituted a printed publication [[Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc. (full text)]];
 


====Events Prior to Filing the Patent Application====
====Events Prior to Filing the Patent Application====
Line 17: Line 18:


[[Philips Electric Co. v. Thermal Industries, Inc.]]
[[Philips Electric Co. v. Thermal Industries, Inc.]]
[[Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc. (full text)]]

Revision as of 16:44, 9 February 2010

35 USC 102

Novelty

Events Prior to the date of Invention

Known or Used by Others in the US
Patented or in a Printed Publication Anywhere

A good discussion of the printed publication bar is in


Events Prior to Filing the Patent Application

Patented or in a Printed Publication Anywhere
In Public Use or on Sale in the US

Other Provisions

Philips Electric Co. v. Thermal Industries, Inc. (full text)

Philips Electric Co. v. Thermal Industries, Inc.