Quanta brief - 901338276: Difference between revisions
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Quanta Computer, Inc. (petitioners) v. LG Electronics, Inc. (respondent) Brief of Amicus Curiae Motorola, Inc. in Support of Petitioners ---- *Motorola is submitting a brief bec..." |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
**For these reasons, Motorola is seeking clarification from the Court regarding the patent exhaustion doctrine and is siding with Quanta in this case. | **For these reasons, Motorola is seeking clarification from the Court regarding the patent exhaustion doctrine and is siding with Quanta in this case. | ||
* | * | ||
'''Back to [[User:KyleR]]''' |
Revision as of 14:37, 29 April 2011
Quanta Computer, Inc. (petitioners) v. LG Electronics, Inc. (respondent)
Brief of Amicus Curiae Motorola, Inc. in Support of Petitioners
- Motorola is submitting a brief because it will be significantly affected by the Court's ruling:
- Motorola, very much like Intel, owns thousands of U.S. patents as well as third-party patents through license agreements.
- Motorola, like Quanta, often purchases components from suppliers and assembles them into its own products.
- For these reasons, Motorola is seeking clarification from the Court regarding the patent exhaustion doctrine and is siding with Quanta in this case.
Back to User:KyleR