Quanta Brief Carter: Difference between revisions

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Dcarter2 (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Quanta Computer Inc. v L.G. Electronics Inc. Supreme Court of the United States Appellate Brief *Interest of the Amicus Curiae **The brief is written by Wi-Lan Inc., a public..."
 
Dcarter2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Appellate Brief
Appellate Brief


*Interest of the Amicus Curiae
Interest of the Amicus Curiae


**The brief is written by Wi-Lan Inc., a publicly traded corporation founded to commercialize breakthroughs in wireless technologies
*The brief is written by Wi-Lan Inc., a publicly traded corporation founded to commercialize breakthroughs in wireless technologies
**The IEEE has incorporated Wi-Lan's technologies into several of its wireless standards that make reliable, high rate data transmissions available to the public.
*The IEEE has incorporated Wi-Lan's technologies into several of its wireless standards that make reliable, high rate data transmissions available to the public.
**Wi-Lan files brief in support of respondent to address legal issues not brought up by members of the court of other amici
*Wi-Lan files brief in support of respondent to address legal issues not brought up by members of the court of other amici
**The company does not approve of the policy adoption the petitioners are advocating due to its likely negative and complicated effect on existing licenses.
*The company does not approve of the policy adoption the petitioners are advocating due to its likely negative and complicated effect on existing licenses.

Revision as of 18:37, 29 April 2011

Quanta Computer Inc. v L.G. Electronics Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Appellate Brief

Interest of the Amicus Curiae

  • The brief is written by Wi-Lan Inc., a publicly traded corporation founded to commercialize breakthroughs in wireless technologies
  • The IEEE has incorporated Wi-Lan's technologies into several of its wireless standards that make reliable, high rate data transmissions available to the public.
  • Wi-Lan files brief in support of respondent to address legal issues not brought up by members of the court of other amici
  • The company does not approve of the policy adoption the petitioners are advocating due to its likely negative and complicated effect on existing licenses.