User contributions for Maura

25 February 2010

• 23:1423:14, 25 February 2010 diff hist −1 Talk:Warner-Jenkinson v. Hilton Davis Petitioner Brief →Maura current
• 23:1423:14, 25 February 2010 diff hist +2,089 Talk:Warner-Jenkinson v. Hilton Davis Petitioner Brief →Maura: new section
• 01:5301:53, 25 February 2010 diff hist +11,299 N Talk:Warner-Jenkinson Company v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 US 17 (1997) Created page with ' == Maura == Patentee brought infringement action against competitor, alleging that competitor's ultrafiltration method for purifying dye infringed patented method under doctrin…'

22 February 2010

• 15:2915:29, 22 February 2010 diff hist −3 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984) No edit summary
• 15:2515:25, 22 February 2010 diff hist +2 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984) No edit summary
• 04:1604:16, 22 February 2010 diff hist +96 Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc., 546 F.2d 530 (1976) No edit summary
• 04:0304:03, 22 February 2010 diff hist +7,155 N Talk:Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984) Created page with ' == Maura == The district court denied Perkin-Elmer's motions for a judgment of infringement notwithstanding the verdict ("JNOV") ISSUES (1) Whether the district court erred in …'
• 04:0104:01, 22 February 2010 diff hist 0 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984) No edit summary
• 04:0004:00, 22 February 2010 diff hist +47,441 N Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984) Created page with '732 F2d 888 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation 732 F.2d 888 221 U.S.P.Q. 669 The PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION, a corporation of New York, Appellee, v. COMPUTERVI…'
• 03:3103:31, 22 February 2010 diff hist +132 Main Page →PRIOR ART

21 February 2010

• 20:3120:31, 21 February 2010 diff hist +5 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) No edit summary
• 20:3020:30, 21 February 2010 diff hist −38 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) No edit summary
• 20:2820:28, 21 February 2010 diff hist +49 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) No edit summary
• 20:1320:13, 21 February 2010 diff hist −79 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) No edit summary
• 20:0820:08, 21 February 2010 diff hist +31 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) No edit summary
• 20:0020:00, 21 February 2010 diff hist +4,403 N Talk:Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) Created page with ' == Maura == 3. The doctrine of equivalents is founded on the theory that, if two devices do the same work in substantially the same way and accomplish substantially the same res…'
• 19:5919:59, 21 February 2010 diff hist −2,170 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) No edit summary
• 19:5019:50, 21 February 2010 diff hist +28,887 N Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) Created page with 'GRAVER TANK & MFG. CO. V. LINDE AIR PRODUCTS CO., 339 U. S. 605 (1950) -- US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez 2/21/10 2:21 AM United States Supreme Court Cases & Opinions J…'
• 19:4919:49, 21 February 2010 diff hist +145 Main Page No edit summary

19 February 2010

• 05:1305:13, 19 February 2010 diff hist +5,196 Talk:In re Brana, 51 F.3d 1560 (1995) →Maura: new section current
• 05:0905:09, 19 February 2010 diff hist +2,680 Talk:Gould v. Hellwarth, 472 F2d 1383 (1973) →Maura: new section current
• 01:5101:51, 19 February 2010 diff hist +13,813 Talk:Atlas Powder v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours, 750 F2d 1569 (1984) →Maura: new section current

15 February 2010

• 06:3906:39, 15 February 2010 diff hist −196 Talk:Hybritech v. Monoclonal Antiboties, 802 F.2d 1375 (1986) →Maura
• 06:3806:38, 15 February 2010 diff hist +8,319 Talk:Hybritech v. Monoclonal Antiboties, 802 F.2d 1375 (1986) →MauraThe judgment of the district court holding the patent in suit invalid is reversed in all respects, and the case is remanded for a determination of the issue of infringement which the court held w: new section
• 06:0106:01, 15 February 2010 diff hist +4,273 Talk:Juicy Whip v. Orange Bang, 185 F.3d 1364 (1999) →Maura: new section
• 05:5005:50, 15 February 2010 diff hist −2 Talk:In Re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350 (1998) →Maura
• 05:4905:49, 15 February 2010 diff hist +7,620 Talk:In Re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350 (1998) →Maura: new section

12 February 2010

• 05:2605:26, 12 February 2010 diff hist +1,498 Talk:Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co., 396 U.S. 57 (1969) →Maura: new section current
• 01:3001:30, 12 February 2010 diff hist +2,010 Talk:Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb, 224 F.2d 530 (1955) →Maura: new section current
• 00:1600:16, 12 February 2010 diff hist +2,171 Talk:A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp., 340 U.S. 147 (1950) →Maura: new section current

8 February 2010

• 15:1215:12, 8 February 2010 diff hist +1,021 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura
• 04:2504:25, 8 February 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura
• 04:2404:24, 8 February 2010 diff hist −1 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura
• 04:2404:24, 8 February 2010 diff hist +4,895 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura: new section

5 February 2010

• 00:3000:30, 5 February 2010 diff hist +9,714 N Talk:Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc., 546 F.2d 530 (1976) Created page with ' == Maura == At issue in this case is the validity of a United States patent1 that pertains to a weight-lifting apparatus. Originally granted to Harold Zinkin, the patent was own…'

4 February 2010

• 23:5623:56, 4 February 2010 diff hist +44,457 N Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc., 546 F.2d 530 (1976) Created page with '546 F2d 530 Universal Athletic Sales Co v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation Inc 546 F.2d 530 192 U.S.P.Q. 193 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SALES CO., a corporatio…'
• 23:5523:55, 4 February 2010 diff hist +215 Main Page →Novelty

31 January 2010

• 21:0821:08, 31 January 2010 diff hist +3,366 Talk:Philips Electric Co. v. Thermal Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164 (1971) →Maura: new section
• 19:3219:32, 31 January 2010 diff hist +3,117 Talk:In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897 (1986) →Maura: new section

29 January 2010

• 06:0706:07, 29 January 2010 diff hist +3,098 Talk:Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, 52 U.S. 11 (1850) →Maura: new section
• 05:5705:57, 29 January 2010 diff hist +3 Talk:Reiner v. I. Leon Co., 285 F.2d 501 (1960) →Maura
• 05:5705:57, 29 January 2010 diff hist +2,071 Talk:Reiner v. I. Leon Co., 285 F.2d 501 (1960) →Maura: new section

25 January 2010

• 02:4002:40, 25 January 2010 diff hist −3 Talk:Metabolit Laboratories, Inc. and Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354 (2004) →Maura
• 02:4002:40, 25 January 2010 diff hist −2 Talk:Metabolit Laboratories, Inc. and Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354 (2004) No edit summary
• 02:4002:40, 25 January 2010 diff hist +11,536 N Talk:Metabolit Laboratories, Inc. and Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354 (2004) Created page with ' == Maura == In most cases, the best source for discerning the proper context of claim terms is the patent specification wherein the patent applicant describes the invention. In…'
• 01:2101:21, 25 January 2010 diff hist +2,998 N Talk:Chester v. Miller (full text) Created page with ' == Maura == The EIC decided that the '280 patent, a parent of Chester's '122 CIP application, was section 102(b) prior art with respect to the CIP claims 1-16, 29, and 30. The …'
• 00:4100:41, 25 January 2010 diff hist +12,853 N Talk:Bendix Corp. v. Balax, Inc. (full text) Created page with ' == Maura == Before trial, plaintiff withdrew its patent No. 2,991,491, admitting its invalidity due to plaintiff's own prior public use. The trial court held plaintiff's Patent …'

18 January 2010

• 04:5004:50, 18 January 2010 diff hist +13,785 Talk:Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981) →Maura: new section
• 01:1001:10, 18 January 2010 diff hist +5,189 N Talk:Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972) Maura

15 January 2010

• 05:4005:40, 15 January 2010 diff hist +11,419 Talk:Bonito Boats v. Thunder Craft, 489 U.S. 141 (1989) →Maura: new section