1/26/11 (Robins)

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Revision as of 17:08, 26 January 2011 by Brobins (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Hotchkiss v Greenwood tells us the overall result must be greater than the sum of the parts. Using a new material in this case was equivalent to the work that a skilled mechanic...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Hotchkiss v Greenwood tells us the overall result must be greater than the sum of the parts. Using a new material in this case was equivalent to the work that a skilled mechanic could perform. Therefore the patent was invalid.

Retrieved from "https://controls.ame.nd.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=1/26/11_(Robins)&oldid=1290"