Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946) Notes

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Revision as of 16:44, 18 February 2011 by Sbonomo (talk | contribs) (Created page with "selling the output for more than 2 yrs before application invalidates patent but in Peerless Roll Leaf Co., output was sold more than 2 yrs before, but said it didnt matter sinc...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

selling the output for more than 2 yrs before application invalidates patent

but in Peerless Roll Leaf Co., output was sold more than 2 yrs before, but said it didnt matter since no knowledge could possibly be acquired of the machine in that way.

nothing in statute says decision should be based on what the output of the invention is, only matters if it was sold for more than 2 yrs.