Difference between revisions of "1/21/11 : Bonito Boats notes"

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
-Bonito Boats filed action against Thunder Craft for violation of the Florida statute.  
 
-Bonito Boats filed action against Thunder Craft for violation of the Florida statute.  
  
-Conclusion: dismissed due to confliction with federal patent law, therefore the Supremacy Clause rules federal patent law higher than state law.
+
-Conclusion: dismissed by Florida Court of Appeals and the Florida Supreme Court due to confliction with federal patent law via the Supremacy Clause; federal patent law rules higher than state law.
 +
 
  
  
 
'''Notes and Facts of the case'''
 
'''Notes and Facts of the case'''
  
-eg
+
-

Revision as of 21:51, 20 January 2011

Case Summary

-Bonito Boats: No patent filed for the utilitarian or design aspects of the hull or manufacturing process (sprayed-fiberglass mold) by which the finished boats were produced.

-After 6 years of production, a Florida statute prohibited the use of a direct molding process to duplicate unpatented boat hulls, and the sale of them.

-Bonito Boats filed action against Thunder Craft for violation of the Florida statute.

-Conclusion: dismissed by Florida Court of Appeals and the Florida Supreme Court due to confliction with federal patent law via the Supremacy Clause; federal patent law rules higher than state law.


Notes and Facts of the case

-