Difference between revisions of "Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co. (KyleR)"

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Overview
 
Overview
 +
----
 +
*case decided by U.S. Supreme Court in 1969
 +
*patent had been granted for "Means for Treating Bituminous Pavement"
 +
**combines a pavement spreader and shaper with a radiant-heat burner to create a better bond between the old and new layer of pavement
 +
*inventor sues for infringement when someone places a radiant-heat burner on a standard paving machine
 +
*District Court: patent is invalid
 +
*Court of Appeals: patent is valid
 +
*Supreme Court: patent is invalid
  
 +
Patent
 +
----
 +
*patentability is said to come from combination of heater and standard paving machine
 +
*radiant-heat burner patented in 1956 by Schwank
 +
*operation of the heater is not dependent on operation of the paving machine
  
 
+
Nonobviousness
 
+
----
 +
*combination of heater and paving machine is a convenience; does not produce a "new or different function"; combination NOT greater than the sum of parts
 +
*filled a long-felt want; commercial success
 +
**does not prove nonobviousness
  
  
 
Back to '''[[Course Notes (KyleR)]]'''
 
Back to '''[[Course Notes (KyleR)]]'''

Latest revision as of 01:22, 31 January 2011

Overview


  • case decided by U.S. Supreme Court in 1969
  • patent had been granted for "Means for Treating Bituminous Pavement"
    • combines a pavement spreader and shaper with a radiant-heat burner to create a better bond between the old and new layer of pavement
  • inventor sues for infringement when someone places a radiant-heat burner on a standard paving machine
  • District Court: patent is invalid
  • Court of Appeals: patent is valid
  • Supreme Court: patent is invalid

Patent


  • patentability is said to come from combination of heater and standard paving machine
  • radiant-heat burner patented in 1956 by Schwank
  • operation of the heater is not dependent on operation of the paving machine

Nonobviousness


  • combination of heater and paving machine is a convenience; does not produce a "new or different function"; combination NOT greater than the sum of parts
  • filled a long-felt want; commercial success
    • does not prove nonobviousness


Back to Course Notes (KyleR)