Cara's HW 4/4

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Revision as of 12:15, 30 March 2011 by Cnorton (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Doctrine of Equivalence == United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit '''Jerome H. Lemelson v. General Mills, Inc.''' No. 90-1359 June 30, 1992 United States Dist...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Doctrine of Equivalence

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Jerome H. Lemelson v. General Mills, Inc.

No. 90-1359

June 30, 1992


United States District Court for Northern District of Illinois found in favor of plaintiff. The United States Court of Appeals reversed.

Lemelson issued a patent for "Toy Track and Vehicle Therefor" (June 24, 1969).

Matel (Defendent-Appellant) began independent track development (1967). Researched the prior art (Lemelson's patent did not yet exist) and concluded that a few features of the track may be patentable. Patented features of Hot Wheels but not the actual track.