Difference between revisions of "EB: Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946)"

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==The Situation== *Mendua invents a process for "building up the worn medal parts of a machine" - process consisting of preparing the metal surface by delivering a preliminary me...")
 
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
==The Decision==
 
==The Decision==
 +
The patent is invalid.
  
 
==The Reasoning==
 
==The Reasoning==
 +
*If a product is sold, even though the process of its manufacutre is not known, it must still be considered in public use.
 +
**The inventor, although not revealing his secret is gaining a competative advantage in his art, thus this constitutes a public use - if he want's those benefits he must file for a legal patent promptly.
 +
**"He must content himself with either secrecy, or legal monopoly."

Latest revision as of 00:10, 17 February 2011

The Situation

  • Mendua invents a process for "building up the worn medal parts of a machine" - process consisting of preparing the metal surface by delivering a preliminary metal layer by means of the "McQuay-Norris"
  • Defendants are appealing the decision that the patent was valid and they infringed it
  • Primary question is whether the invention was in public use two years before it was filed on august 6, 1942.

The Decision

The patent is invalid.

The Reasoning

  • If a product is sold, even though the process of its manufacutre is not known, it must still be considered in public use.
    • The inventor, although not revealing his secret is gaining a competative advantage in his art, thus this constitutes a public use - if he want's those benefits he must file for a legal patent promptly.
    • "He must content himself with either secrecy, or legal monopoly."