Kemnetz: GE Turbine Case & Catheter Case 04/13/2011

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Revision as of 12:17, 13 April 2011 by Kristen kemnetz (talk | contribs) (Created page with "* issue about springs, GE used diff springs & thought they were good to go, but court said no * then there's the issue of geometry (where GE is winning in this case) b/c claims ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • issue about springs, GE used diff springs & thought they were good to go, but court said no
  • then there's the issue of geometry (where GE is winning in this case) b/c claims were modified to further distinguish based on prior art, if your original claims can't back your amendments, you lose your original filing date.