Difference between revisions of "Patent Claims and Infringement (JWB)"
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchJosh Bradley (talk | contribs) (Created page with "*Claims: **most important part of a patent **define the boundaries of the property right *Interpreting claims for two reasons **with respect to the prior art, to determine valid...") |
Josh Bradley (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
**with respect to some possibly infringing thing | **with respect to some possibly infringing thing | ||
*Term used for interpreting: does the claim “read on” the prior art or possibly infringing device? | *Term used for interpreting: does the claim “read on” the prior art or possibly infringing device? | ||
− | **A claim reads on something if <u>everything</u> (elements and relationship among elements) in the claim appears in the something. It does <u><b>not matter</b><u> if other things are present in that something | + | **A claim reads on something if <u>everything</u> (elements and relationship among elements) in the claim appears in the something. It does <u><b>not matter</b></u> if other things are present in that something |
***Example: | ***Example: | ||
****I claim a chair comprising | ****I claim a chair comprising |
Revision as of 13:17, 11 March 2011
- Claims:
- most important part of a patent
- define the boundaries of the property right
- Interpreting claims for two reasons
- with respect to the prior art, to determine validity
- with respect to some possibly infringing thing
- Term used for interpreting: does the claim “read on” the prior art or possibly infringing device?
- A claim reads on something if everything (elements and relationship among elements) in the claim appears in the something. It does not matter if other things are present in that something
- Example:
- I claim a chair comprising
- Example:
- A claim reads on something if everything (elements and relationship among elements) in the claim appears in the something. It does not matter if other things are present in that something
- a seat;
- a back attached to the seat; and
- legs attached to the seat.
- Infringing:
- a chair that has a seat, back, and legs, plus armrests
- a chair with a seat, back, and legs, with foldable seat part
- Non-infringing:
- stool with seat and legs, but no back
- Infringing:
- Example 2:
- I claim a stool comprising
- a seat;
- legs attached to the seat; and
- no back
- all chairs infringe stool patent
- If the stool were patented first, the improved stool with a back (i.e. chair) would be patentable, but the chair patent owner could not make, use, or sell chairs without permission of stool patent owner
- Correspondingly, stool patent owner cannot add backs to his stools without permission of chair patent owner
- Limited testing by each side is allowed
- Result: incentive to cross-license