Difference between revisions of "Patent Claims and Infringement (JWB)"

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "*Claims: **most important part of a patent **define the boundaries of the property right *Interpreting claims for two reasons **with respect to the prior art, to determine valid...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
**with respect to some possibly infringing thing
 
**with respect to some possibly infringing thing
 
*Term used for interpreting: does the claim “read on” the prior art or possibly infringing device?
 
*Term used for interpreting: does the claim “read on” the prior art or possibly infringing device?
**A claim reads on something if <u>everything</u> (elements and relationship among elements) in the claim appears in the something.  It does <u><b>not matter</b><u> if other things are present in that something
+
**A claim reads on something if <u>everything</u> (elements and relationship among elements) in the claim appears in the something.  It does <u><b>not matter</b></u> if other things are present in that something
 
***Example:  
 
***Example:  
 
****I claim a chair comprising
 
****I claim a chair comprising

Revision as of 13:17, 11 March 2011

  • Claims:
    • most important part of a patent
    • define the boundaries of the property right
  • Interpreting claims for two reasons
    • with respect to the prior art, to determine validity
    • with respect to some possibly infringing thing
  • Term used for interpreting: does the claim “read on” the prior art or possibly infringing device?
    • A claim reads on something if everything (elements and relationship among elements) in the claim appears in the something. It does not matter if other things are present in that something
      • Example:
        • I claim a chair comprising
a seat;
a back attached to the seat; and
legs attached to the seat.
        • Infringing:
          • a chair that has a seat, back, and legs, plus armrests
          • a chair with a seat, back, and legs, with foldable seat part
        • Non-infringing:
          • stool with seat and legs, but no back
      • Example 2:
        • I claim a stool comprising
a seat;
legs attached to the seat; and
no back
        • all chairs infringe stool patent
        • If the stool were patented first, the improved stool with a back (i.e. chair) would be patentable, but the chair patent owner could not make, use, or sell chairs without permission of stool patent owner
        • Correspondingly, stool patent owner cannot add backs to his stools without permission of chair patent owner
        • Limited testing by each side is allowed
        • Result: incentive to cross-license