View source for RPC:Bilski Brief-John Sutton

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki

← RPC:Bilski Brief-John Sutton

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

---

You can view and copy the source of this page.

John Sutton: retired patent lawyer Disagrees with Federal circuit decision, which gave validity to patent. #Bilski method is nothing more than typical commodity trading, not the work of an artisan. Commercial actions are not inventions. no evidence that commercial trading is a useful art. also manipulating the marteplace does not provide advantages to the public for the exertion of the individual. #Processes do work, and may be an application of a law or principle, but the principle itself is not patentable. Nature's handiwork cannot be patented. Also, giving this a patent does not promote progress in the field. #no definitive test is grounds for patent ship, just the law

Return to RPC:Bilski Brief-John Sutton.