User contributions
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search- 23:45, 13 April 2010 diff hist +4,408 N Talk:In re Kahn, CAFC 04-1616 (2006) Created page with ' == Maura == First, the Board rejected the argument that the invention’s intended use supports patentability, noting that “the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intende…' current
- 23:41, 13 April 2010 diff hist +39,378 N In re Kahn, CAFC 04-1616 (2006) Created page with 'United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1616 (Serial No. 08/773,282) IN RE LEONARD R. KAHN Leonard R. Kahn, pro se, of New York, New York. John M. Whealan, …' current
- 23:09, 13 April 2010 diff hist +37 Main Page →ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF CASES
- 23:22, 11 April 2010 diff hist +39,149 N Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Company, 97 U.S. 126 (1877) Created page with '97 U.S. 126 24 L.Ed. 1000 ELIZABETH v. PAVEMENT COMPANY. October Term, 1877 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. The facts are…' current
- 10:18, 9 April 2010 diff hist +19 Main Page →ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF CASES
- 00:07, 9 April 2010 diff hist 0 Main Page →ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF CASES
- 00:07, 9 April 2010 diff hist +5,035 N Talk:Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946) Created page with ' == Maura == The rule that an inventor may not competitively exploit his machine or process for more than a year before applying for a patent thereon does not apply to an invento…' current
- 00:05, 9 April 2010 diff hist -188 Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946)
- 00:05, 9 April 2010 diff hist +20,544 N Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946) Created page with 'Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. METALLIZING ENGINEERING CO., Inc., v. KENYON BEARING & AUTO PARTS CO., Inc., et al. No. 131. Jan. 10, 1946. Writ of Certiorari Den…'
- 00:00, 9 April 2010 diff hist +3,662 N Talk:Elizabeth v. Pavement Company, 97 U.S. 126 (1877) Created page with ' == Maura == A foreign patent, or other foreign printed publication describing an invention, is no defence to a suit upon a patent of the United States, unless published anterio…' current
- 23:58, 8 April 2010 diff hist +39,295 N Elizabeth v. Pavement Company, 97 U.S. 126 (1877) Created page with '97 U.S. 126 24 L.Ed. 1000 ELIZABETH v. PAVEMENT COMPANY. October Term, 1877 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. The facts ar…' current
- 23:52, 8 April 2010 diff hist +3,756 N Talk:Egbert v. Lippmann, 104 U.S. 333 (1881) Created page with ' == Maura == The sixth, seventh, and fifteenth sections of the act of July 4, 1836, c. 357 (5 Stat. 117), as qualified by the seventh section of the act of March 8, 1839, c. 88 …'
- 23:51, 8 April 2010 diff hist +13,774 N Egbert v. Lippmann, 104 U.S. 333 (1881) Created page with '104 US 333 Egbert v. Lippmann 104 U.S. 333 104 U.S. 333 26 L.Ed. 755 EGBERT v. LIPPMANN. Oct. Term, 1881 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern D…'
- 23:47, 8 April 2010 diff hist +202 Main Page →ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF CASES
- 23:13, 29 March 2010 diff hist +3,383 N Talk:Quanta Computers Inc v. LG Electronics (full text) Created page with ' == Maura == LGE licensed a patent portfolio, including the LGE Patents, to Intel Corporation (Intel). The cross-licensing agreement (License Agreement) permits Intel to manufac…' current
- 23:11, 29 March 2010 diff hist -177 Quanta Computers Inc v. LG Electronics (full text)
- 23:07, 29 March 2010 diff hist +43,472 N Quanta Computers Inc v. LG Electronics (full text) Created page with 'QUANTA COMPUTER, INC., et al. v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the federal circuit No. 06-937. Argued January 16, 2008--Decided Ju…'
- 23:06, 29 March 2010 diff hist +56 Main Page →ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF CASES
- 14:42, 22 March 2010 diff hist +5,739 N Talk:U.S. v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241 (1942) Created page with ' == Maura == The court thought that without the granted license the final step in finishing the lens would infringe the patent and concluded that for this reason the Corporation…'
- 14:25, 22 March 2010 diff hist +3,951 N Talk:Filmtec Corp. v. Allied-Signal Inc., 939 F.2d 1568 (1991) Created page with ' == Maura == It is well settled in this court that a party seeking a preliminary injunction must establish a right thereto in light of four factors: 1) a reasonable likelihood o…'
- 14:07, 22 March 2010 diff hist +4,814 N Talk:Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, 210 U.S. 339 (1908) Created page with ' == Maura == It is contended that this power to control further sales is given by statute to the owner of such a copyright in conferring the sole right to ‘vend’ a copyright…'
- 10:28, 22 March 2010 diff hist +7,562 N Talk:Asgrow Seed Co. v. Winterboer, 513 U.S. 179 (1994) Created page with ' == Maura == The Plant Variety Protection Act of 1970, 7 U.S.C. § 2321 et seq., protects owners of novel seed varieties against unauthorized sales of their seed for replanting …' current
- 10:11, 22 March 2010 diff hist +34,317 N Asgrow Seed Co. v. Winterboer, 513 U.S. 179 (1994) Created page with '513 US 179 Asgrow Seed Company v. Winterboer 513 U.S. 179 115 S.Ct. 788 130 L.Ed.2d 682 ASGROW SEED COMPANY, Petitioner v. Denny WINTERBOER and Becky Winterboer, dba Deebees. No.…' current
- 10:09, 22 March 2010 diff hist +56 Main Page →ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF CASES
- 20:29, 18 March 2010 diff hist +3,468 N Talk:In Re Bilski, Rader dissenting opinion Created page with ' == Maura == Thus, the Patent Act from its inception focused patentability on the specific characteristics of the claimed invention-its novelty and utility-not on its particular…'
- 19:46, 18 March 2010 diff hist +8,617 N Talk:In Re Bilski, Newman dissenting opinion Created page with ' == Maura == The court achieves this result by redefining the word “process” in the patent statute, to exclude all processes that do not transform physical matter or that ar…'
- 13:48, 18 March 2010 diff hist +6,600 N Talk:In Re Bilski, Mayer dissenting opinion Created page with ' == Maura == The patent system is intended to protect and promote advances in science and technology, not ideas about how to structure commercial transactions. Claim 1 of the ap…'
- 11:32, 18 March 2010 diff hist +2,933 N Talk:In Re Bilski, Dky concurring opinion Created page with ' == Maura == In fact, the unpatentability of processes not involving manufactures, machines, or compositions of matter has been firmly embedded in the statute since the time of …'
- 02:13, 15 March 2010 diff hist -1 Talk:In Re Bilski →Maura
- 02:13, 15 March 2010 diff hist +7,334 Talk:In Re Bilski →Maura: new section
- 16:58, 2 March 2010 diff hist -1 Talk:Bonito Boats v. Thunder Craft, 489 U.S. 141 (1989) →Maura current
- 16:57, 2 March 2010 diff hist -1 Talk:Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corp., 958 F.2d 1053 (1992) →Maura
- 16:57, 2 March 2010 diff hist +5,193 Talk:Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corp., 958 F.2d 1053 (1992) →Maura: new section
- 16:54, 2 March 2010 diff hist +4,196 Talk:State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (1998) →Maura: new section
- 10:42, 26 February 2010 diff hist -1,040 Talk:Warner-Jenkinson Company v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 US 17 (1997) →Maura current
- 20:39, 25 February 2010 diff hist +3,831 Talk:Warner-Jenkinson v. Hilton Davis Respondent Brief →Maura: new section current
- 19:14, 25 February 2010 diff hist -1 Talk:Warner-Jenkinson v. Hilton Davis Petitioner Brief →Maura current
- 19:14, 25 February 2010 diff hist +2,089 Talk:Warner-Jenkinson v. Hilton Davis Petitioner Brief →Maura: new section
- 21:53, 24 February 2010 diff hist +11,299 N Talk:Warner-Jenkinson Company v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 US 17 (1997) Created page with ' == Maura == Patentee brought infringement action against competitor, alleging that competitor's ultrafiltration method for purifying dye infringed patented method under doctrin…'
- 11:29, 22 February 2010 diff hist -3 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984)
- 11:25, 22 February 2010 diff hist +2 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984)
- 00:16, 22 February 2010 diff hist +96 Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc., 546 F.2d 530 (1976)
- 00:03, 22 February 2010 diff hist +7,155 N Talk:Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984) Created page with ' == Maura == The district court denied Perkin-Elmer's motions for a judgment of infringement notwithstanding the verdict ("JNOV") ISSUES (1) Whether the district court erred in …'
- 00:01, 22 February 2010 diff hist 0 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984)
- 00:00, 22 February 2010 diff hist +47,441 N Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation, 732 F2d 888 (1984) Created page with '732 F2d 888 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Computervision Corporation 732 F.2d 888 221 U.S.P.Q. 669 The PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION, a corporation of New York, Appellee, v. COMPUTERVI…'
- 23:31, 21 February 2010 diff hist +132 Main Page →PRIOR ART
- 16:31, 21 February 2010 diff hist +5 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950)
- 16:30, 21 February 2010 diff hist -38 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950)
- 16:28, 21 February 2010 diff hist +49 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950)
- 16:13, 21 February 2010 diff hist -79 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950)
- 16:08, 21 February 2010 diff hist +31 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950)
- 16:00, 21 February 2010 diff hist +4,403 N Talk:Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) Created page with ' == Maura == 3. The doctrine of equivalents is founded on the theory that, if two devices do the same work in substantially the same way and accomplish substantially the same res…'
- 15:59, 21 February 2010 diff hist -2,170 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950)
- 15:50, 21 February 2010 diff hist +28,887 N Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) Created page with 'GRAVER TANK & MFG. CO. V. LINDE AIR PRODUCTS CO., 339 U. S. 605 (1950) -- US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez 2/21/10 2:21 AM United States Supreme Court Cases & Opinions J…'
- 15:49, 21 February 2010 diff hist +145 Main Page
- 01:13, 19 February 2010 diff hist +5,196 Talk:In re Brana, 51 F.3d 1560 (1995) →Maura: new section current
- 01:09, 19 February 2010 diff hist +2,680 Talk:Gould v. Hellwarth, 472 F2d 1383 (1973) →Maura: new section current
- 21:51, 18 February 2010 diff hist +13,813 Talk:Atlas Powder v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours, 750 F2d 1569 (1984) →Maura: new section current
- 02:39, 15 February 2010 diff hist -196 Talk:Hybritech v. Monoclonal Antiboties, 802 F.2d 1375 (1986) →Maura
- 02:38, 15 February 2010 diff hist +8,319 Talk:Hybritech v. Monoclonal Antiboties, 802 F.2d 1375 (1986) →MauraThe judgment of the district court holding the patent in suit invalid is reversed in all respects, and the case is remanded for a determination of the issue of infringement which the court held w: new section
- 02:01, 15 February 2010 diff hist +4,273 Talk:Juicy Whip v. Orange Bang, 185 F.3d 1364 (1999) →Maura: new section
- 01:50, 15 February 2010 diff hist -2 Talk:In Re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350 (1998) →Maura
- 01:49, 15 February 2010 diff hist +7,620 Talk:In Re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350 (1998) →Maura: new section
- 01:26, 12 February 2010 diff hist +1,498 Talk:Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co., 396 U.S. 57 (1969) →Maura: new section current
- 21:30, 11 February 2010 diff hist +2,010 Talk:Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb, 224 F.2d 530 (1955) →Maura: new section current
- 20:16, 11 February 2010 diff hist +2,171 Talk:A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp., 340 U.S. 147 (1950) →Maura: new section current
- 11:12, 8 February 2010 diff hist +1,021 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura
- 00:25, 8 February 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura
- 00:24, 8 February 2010 diff hist -1 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura
- 00:24, 8 February 2010 diff hist +4,895 Talk:Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) →Maura: new section
- 20:30, 4 February 2010 diff hist +9,714 N Talk:Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc., 546 F.2d 530 (1976) Created page with ' == Maura == At issue in this case is the validity of a United States patent1 that pertains to a weight-lifting apparatus. Originally granted to Harold Zinkin, the patent was own…'
- 19:56, 4 February 2010 diff hist +44,457 N Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc., 546 F.2d 530 (1976) Created page with '546 F2d 530 Universal Athletic Sales Co v. American Gym Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation Inc 546 F.2d 530 192 U.S.P.Q. 193 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SALES CO., a corporatio…'
- 19:55, 4 February 2010 diff hist +215 Main Page →Novelty
- 17:08, 31 January 2010 diff hist +3,366 Talk:Philips Electric Co. v. Thermal Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164 (1971) →Maura: new section
- 15:32, 31 January 2010 diff hist +3,117 Talk:In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897 (1986) →Maura: new section
- 02:07, 29 January 2010 diff hist +3,098 Talk:Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, 52 U.S. 11 (1850) →Maura: new section
- 01:57, 29 January 2010 diff hist +3 Talk:Reiner v. I. Leon Co., 285 F.2d 501 (1960) →Maura
- 01:57, 29 January 2010 diff hist +2,071 Talk:Reiner v. I. Leon Co., 285 F.2d 501 (1960) →Maura: new section
- 22:40, 24 January 2010 diff hist -3 Talk:Metabolit Laboratories, Inc. and Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354 (2004) →Maura
- 22:40, 24 January 2010 diff hist -2 Talk:Metabolit Laboratories, Inc. and Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354 (2004)
- 22:40, 24 January 2010 diff hist +11,536 N Talk:Metabolit Laboratories, Inc. and Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354 (2004) Created page with ' == Maura == In most cases, the best source for discerning the proper context of claim terms is the patent specification wherein the patent applicant describes the invention. In…'
- 21:21, 24 January 2010 diff hist +2,998 N Talk:Chester v. Miller (full text) Created page with ' == Maura == The EIC decided that the '280 patent, a parent of Chester's '122 CIP application, was section 102(b) prior art with respect to the CIP claims 1-16, 29, and 30. The …'
- 20:41, 24 January 2010 diff hist +12,853 N Talk:Bendix Corp. v. Balax, Inc. (full text) Created page with ' == Maura == Before trial, plaintiff withdrew its patent No. 2,991,491, admitting its invalidity due to plaintiff's own prior public use. The trial court held plaintiff's Patent …'
- 00:50, 18 January 2010 diff hist +13,785 Talk:Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981) →Maura: new section
- 21:10, 17 January 2010 diff hist +5,189 N Talk:Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972) Maura
- 01:40, 15 January 2010 diff hist +11,419 Talk:Bonito Boats v. Thunder Craft, 489 U.S. 141 (1989) →Maura: new section
