Long pages
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchShowing below up to 346 results in range #501 to #846.
View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- (hist) Godshall: 3-23-2011 HW [1,884 bytes]
- (hist) Graham v. John Deere (JWB Class) [1,871 bytes]
- (hist) KSR Karch [1,869 bytes]
- (hist) US v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39 (1966) Notes [1,859 bytes]
- (hist) Cara's Homework 1 [1,859 bytes]
- (hist) 901444263: Quanta v. LGE Reply Brief of Petitioners [1,851 bytes]
- (hist) 901444263:Quanta v. LGE Reply Brief of Petitioners [1,851 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta v. LGE Reply Brief of Petitioners [1,851 bytes]
- (hist) Gottschalk v. Benson SKH [1,850 bytes]
- (hist) Apr. 29th: Brief Summary (2007 WL 3440937) - Andrew McBride [1,844 bytes]
- (hist) United States Patent 4,424,275 (RCTA) [1,837 bytes]
- (hist) Case 20: Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) [1,836 bytes]
- (hist) Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co. (901422128) [1,836 bytes]
- (hist) Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co. (JWB) [1,805 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief - ewolz [1,803 bytes]
- (hist) Notes from 3/11/2011 [1,769 bytes]
- (hist) Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corp. SKH [1,769 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 26: Case on Doctrine of Equivalence [1,767 bytes]
- (hist) Notes from 3/9/2011 [1,764 bytes]
- (hist) Egbert v. Lippmann SKH [1,760 bytes]
- (hist) In re Hall (JWB) [1,756 bytes]
- (hist) Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. (901422128) [1,741 bytes]
- (hist) Bilski Brief: Professor Lee A. Hollaar and IEEE-USA as Amici Curiae in Support of Affirmance (Robins Homework 5) [1,740 bytes]
- (hist) H.H. Robertson, Co. v. United Steel Deck, Inc. (901422128) [1,737 bytes]
- (hist) Pfaff v. Wells Electronics (901422128) [1,734 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief: In support of Federal Circuit Ruling (eguilbea) [1,718 bytes]
- (hist) Dsakamot 3/23/11 homework [1,705 bytes]
- (hist) Obvious Analysis [1,702 bytes]
- (hist) Case 27: CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation (2002) [1,692 bytes]
- (hist) Doctrine of Equivalence Supplement: Johnston v. IVAC Corp. (JWB) [1,686 bytes]
- (hist) State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (1998) Notes [1,686 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief (John Gallagher) [1,674 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. Tea Co. Karch [1,661 bytes]
- (hist) Snooki's Homework due 3/23/11 [1,651 bytes]
- (hist) General I.P. Information (JWB) [1,644 bytes]
- (hist) Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Company (KyleR) [1,633 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 3/22 901479977 [1,632 bytes]
- (hist) BWC --- HW 2.3 [1,632 bytes]
- (hist) Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co., 396 U.S. 57 (1969) Notes [1,626 bytes]
- (hist) Gottschalk v. Benson (JWB Class) [1,610 bytes]
- (hist) EB: EGBERT v. LIPPMANN, 104 U.S. 333 (1881) [1,609 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. TEA CO. v. SUPERMARKET CORP., 340 U.S. 147 (1950) [1,608 bytes]
- (hist) Graham v. John Deere: Analysis concluding obviousness/nonobviousness, homework for 2/4/2011 [1,606 bytes]
- (hist) Appellate Brief for Petitioner (January 1939) in The Electric Storage Battery Co., Petitioner, v. Genzo Shimadzu and Northeastern Engineering Corporation, Respondents (RCTA) [1,602 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp. (JWB) [1,587 bytes]
- (hist) Cara's hw 3/23/2011 [1,575 bytes]
- (hist) EB: BILSKI v. KAPPOS, 130 S.Ct. 3218 (2010) [1,571 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp., 340 U.S. 147(1950) analysis [1,555 bytes]
- (hist) Riester: 3/23/11 Homework [1,554 bytes]
- (hist) Tennant Case 6: US v. Adams (1966) [1,551 bytes]
- (hist) Case 30: Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar (1991) [1,547 bytes]
- (hist) Eric Paul's Printed Publication Case - 23 MAR 2011 [1,543 bytes]
- (hist) Elizabeth v. American Pavement Karch [1,535 bytes]
- (hist) HW - March 23, 2011 - (pfleury) [1,534 bytes]
- (hist) 4/6/11 (Robins) [1,523 bytes]
- (hist) RPC:HW due 2-4-11 [1,519 bytes]
- (hist) Case 25: In re Carlson (1992) [1,516 bytes]
- (hist) Printed Publication Bars (JWB) [1,513 bytes]
- (hist) Due Wednesday, March 23, 2011 [1,513 bytes]
- (hist) Doctrine of Equivalents (HW 4-4) (RCTA) [1,505 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1: 1980-1990 Patent [1,496 bytes]
- (hist) Notes form 3/11/2011 [1,492 bytes]
- (hist) Feb. 14: Brief of Entrepreneurial and Consumer Advocates Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent SKH [1,491 bytes]
- (hist) Cara's HW 4/4 [1,487 bytes]
- (hist) 1/26/11 : A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp. [1,487 bytes]
- (hist) Here in list of arguments in Quanta [1,478 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief - Kschlax [1,476 bytes]
- (hist) Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corp., 958 F.2d 1053 (1992)(Robins) [1,463 bytes]
- (hist) PL Homework 1 -- Due Monday, January 24 [1,458 bytes]
- (hist) Diamond v. Diehr (KyleR) [1,450 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 3/9/2011 (Fernando Rodriguez) [1,448 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief - 901425018 [1,440 bytes]
- (hist) Kemnetz: Bilski v. Doll Petitioner's Reply Brief Notes [1,421 bytes]
- (hist) Hotchkiss v. Greenwood (Robins) [1,408 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp. (Robins) [1,403 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 6 (due Wednesday 23)~jnosal [1,401 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 2 - Nonobviousness Analysis - Selected Patent [1,400 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief: Tennant [1,398 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 3 - pfleury [1,391 bytes]
- (hist) Tennant Case 8: KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc. (2007) [1,386 bytes]
- (hist) Doctrine of Equivalence Case - Adam Mahood [1,385 bytes]
- (hist) Tennant Homework 3: Examining Nonobviousness [1,362 bytes]
- (hist) Hotchkiss Knobs [1,361 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief - Andrew Chipouras [1,347 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 4 [1,343 bytes]
- (hist) Mitros:Homework 1 [1,336 bytes]
- (hist) 3/9/11 (Robins) [1,317 bytes]
- (hist) CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation, 288 F.3d 1359 (2002) Summary sbonomo [1,314 bytes]
- (hist) KSchlax:Hw3 [1,300 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 2: [1,290 bytes]
- (hist) Bonito Boats Notes (Fernando Rodriguez) [1,281 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notres 2/9/2011 (Fernando Rodriguez) [1,263 bytes]
- (hist) Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, 52 U.S. 11 (1850) analysis [1,262 bytes]
- (hist) Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co. SKH [1,260 bytes]
- (hist) Printed Publication Carter [1,253 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 2/18/2011(Fernando Rodriguez) [1,249 bytes]
- (hist) Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corp. (JWB Class) [1,247 bytes]
- (hist) Non-Obvious Analysis [1,238 bytes]
- (hist) BWC --- Pickering v. Holman, 459 F.2d 403 [1,237 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 3/23 (John Gallagher) [1,234 bytes]
- (hist) Description of My Patent's References (KyleR) [1,232 bytes]
- (hist) HW 5 Fernando Rodriguez ResQNet.com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc. [1,217 bytes]
- (hist) Tennant Homework 1: Clutch And Brake Assembly and Production Method [1,213 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp. (1950) [1,212 bytes]
- (hist) Homework: Printed Publication [1,202 bytes]
- (hist) EB: ANDERSON'S BLACK ROCK, INC. v. PAVEMENT CO., 396 U.S. 57 (1969) [1,201 bytes]
- (hist) UMC Electronics Co. v. U.S., 816 F.2d 647 (1987) Notes [1,193 bytes]
- (hist) Gottschalk v. Benson (KyleR) [1,189 bytes]
- (hist) 3/21/2011: MIT v. Harman International Industries - Stulc [1,183 bytes]
- (hist) In re Hall Homework Anthony Schlehuber [1,179 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1 - Due Monday, January 24 [1,154 bytes]
- (hist) In re Hall (901422128) [1,152 bytes]
- (hist) Jan. 24: Patent SKH [1,149 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 3/23 - Printed Publication bar (KyleR) [1,144 bytes]
- (hist) 2/21/11 (Robins) [1,142 bytes]
- (hist) == Homework Assignment 1: == [1,141 bytes]
- (hist) Johnston v. IVAC Corp. (JWB) [1,131 bytes]
- (hist) Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co. (901422128) [1,125 bytes]
- (hist) Relationship with Novelty (RCTA) [1,124 bytes]
- (hist) Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu, 307 U.S. 5 (1939) (Robins) [1,111 bytes]
- (hist) Egbert v. Lippmann (JWB Class) [1,110 bytes]
- (hist) In Class Clarification of Doc. of Equivalents [1,109 bytes]
- (hist) Tennant Case 7: Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co. (1969) [1,108 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. (901422129) [1,100 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1: Due Monday January 24 [1,099 bytes]
- (hist) Kemnetz: Class Notes - Clear Equivalence vs. Clear Non-Equivalence [1,090 bytes]
- (hist) 3/30/11 : Homework based on the Warner-Jenkinson case (kyergler) [1,073 bytes]
- (hist) Hotchkiss v. Greenwood (JWB Class) [1,068 bytes]
- (hist) Lyon Karch [1,059 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 2/21/2011 (Fernando Rodriguez) [1,053 bytes]
- (hist) Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Homedics, Inc. - Supplementary Case [1,035 bytes]
- (hist) Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corp. (KyleR) [1,026 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1/24 (John Gallagher) [1,024 bytes]
- (hist) My Selected US Patent [1,020 bytes]
- (hist) 1/24/2011:Rear Derailleur for a Bicycle Patent - Stulc [1,015 bytes]
- (hist) Gottschalk v. Benson (JWB) [1,011 bytes]
- (hist) Honeywell Brief notes [1,008 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1: My Selected U.S. Patent (Ackroyd) [995 bytes]
- (hist) NOVELTY [989 bytes]
- (hist) Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co. (KyleR) [987 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 1/26/2011 [985 bytes]
- (hist) Case 28: Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. (1950) [980 bytes]
- (hist) Warner-Jenkinson (Robins) [973 bytes]
- (hist) Patent Prosecution Process Notes [968 bytes]
- (hist) ESB Briefs [952 bytes]
- (hist) 2/4/11 : KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc. (kyergler) [950 bytes]
- (hist) EB: i4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp., 598 F.3d 831 (2010) [948 bytes]
- (hist) Cara's Homework 2 [943 bytes]
- (hist) P. 256, lines -5 and -6 [932 bytes]
- (hist) Kgodshal Homework 1 [922 bytes]
- (hist) 1/31/11 : Anderson's Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Co. (kyergler) [909 bytes]
- (hist) Lorenz v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co (1948) (Robins) [908 bytes]
- (hist) Patent:Waterproof Miniature Flashlight [902 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1 - My Patent Selection - Due 1/24 [902 bytes]
- (hist) Selected Patent [890 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 7: In re Hall Supplementary Case [873 bytes]
- (hist) UMC Electronics vs. US (Robins) [873 bytes]
- (hist) EB: Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946) [872 bytes]
- (hist) RPC:HW 4-29-11:Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics: Brief [861 bytes]
- (hist) 1/31/11 (Robins) [858 bytes]
- (hist) Bonito Boats v. Thunder Craft (1989) [857 bytes]
- (hist) CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation, 288 F.3d 1359 (2002) Notes [848 bytes]
- (hist) RPC:HW 3-30-11: Walter-Jenkinson v. Hilton Davis similar case [846 bytes]
- (hist) US Patent 4538509: Automatic Bread Baking Machine [838 bytes]
- (hist) Football Throwing Machine: U.S. Pat. No. 4,596,230, issued Jun. 24, 1986 [834 bytes]
- (hist) HW 6 Fernando Rodriguez [819 bytes]
- (hist) Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946) Notes [819 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 3/2/2010 (Fernando Rodriguez) [817 bytes]
- (hist) EB: Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008) [795 bytes]
- (hist) 1/28/11 Robins [795 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1 - Patent Selection [789 bytes]
- (hist) Case 14: Egbert v. Lippmann (1881) [783 bytes]
- (hist) My Selected US Patent, homework for January 24, 2011 [775 bytes]
- (hist) KSchlax:Hw1 [774 bytes]
- (hist) P. 733, line 19 [766 bytes]
- (hist) 2/14/11 : Bilski v. Kappos (kyergler) [758 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1: Jan 24 Karch [755 bytes]
- (hist) Due Wednesday, February 8, 2011 [752 bytes]
- (hist) Objective Tests (RCTA) [740 bytes]
- (hist) RPC:HW 3-23-11:In re Hall similar case [731 bytes]
- (hist) P. 238, lines -3 and -3 [730 bytes]
- (hist) Course Notes (KyleR) [726 bytes]
- (hist) P. 542, last boxed set of equations [705 bytes]
- (hist) CM BriefQuanta [705 bytes]
- (hist) EB: Patent Prosecution Process (Part II): Notes Friday, April 8th [705 bytes]
- (hist) Re Holt KeyCite brief (Robins) [704 bytes]
- (hist) CM InreHall [702 bytes]
- (hist) CM Accelerometer [690 bytes]
- (hist) RPC:Bilski Brief-John Sutton [685 bytes]
- (hist) Case 31: TurboCare Div. of Demag Delaval Turbomachinery Corp. v. General Elec. Co. (2001) [679 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1/24 (KyleR) [677 bytes]
- (hist) 2/7/11 : Gottschalk v. Benson (kyergler) [656 bytes]
- (hist) P. 592, lines 11 and 12 [648 bytes]
- (hist) Riester: "clear" case [648 bytes]
- (hist) State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. (JWB Class) [648 bytes]
- (hist) Case 26: In re Hall (1986) [632 bytes]
- (hist) UMC Electronics Co. Patent (JWB) [626 bytes]
- (hist) Jan. 24th: Patent Description - Andrew McBride [623 bytes]
- (hist) Hotchkiss v. Greenwood SKH [620 bytes]
- (hist) Kemnetz: Warner-Jenkinson v. Hilton Davis Petitioner Brief Debate [618 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 8: Clear Example of Doctrine of Equivalents [614 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp. SKH [608 bytes]
- (hist) 1/26/11 (Robins) [599 bytes]
- (hist) CM BriefSutton [595 bytes]
- (hist) Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics, 525 U.S. 55 (1998) Notes [578 bytes]
- (hist) Bonito Boats notes 1/21/11 [563 bytes]
- (hist) Vas-Cath v. Mahurkar (Robins) [561 bytes]
- (hist) Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) Summary sbonomo [528 bytes]
- (hist) The Inventive Step (RCTA) [524 bytes]
- (hist) Underwater Camera (Homework 1) [514 bytes]
- (hist) Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) (Robins) [504 bytes]
- (hist) P. 206, lines 4 and 7 [503 bytes]
- (hist) P. 138, line 6 (large boxed equation) [496 bytes]
- (hist) HW1 (Fernando Rodriguez) [492 bytes]
- (hist) P. 265, Equation (7.16) [489 bytes]
- (hist) HW1 [488 bytes]
- (hist) State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. (KyleR) [479 bytes]
- (hist) P. 654, line 1, Equation (13.23) [470 bytes]
- (hist) US v. Adams (JWB Class) [469 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1 [466 bytes]
- (hist) P. 195, line 1 [447 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 2/11/2011 [445 bytes]
- (hist) Homeworks [445 bytes]
- (hist) P. 600, line 10 [443 bytes]
- (hist) Latin Terms [441 bytes]
- (hist) P. 209, line -8 [435 bytes]
- (hist) 2/11/11 (Robins) [429 bytes]
- (hist) P. 210, line 1 [427 bytes]
- (hist) Compositional Boundedness of Solutions for Symmetric Nonautonomous Control Systems [424 bytes]
- (hist) Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 US 605 (1950) Notes [423 bytes]
- (hist) Graver (Robins) [421 bytes]
- (hist) D.L. Auld Co. v. Chroma Graphics Corp., 714 F.2d 1144 (1983) Notes [421 bytes]
- (hist) Supremacy Clause [410 bytes]
- (hist) 3/21/11 (Robins) [405 bytes]
- (hist) 4/20/11 (Robins) [404 bytes]
- (hist) Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc. (JWB Class) [398 bytes]
- (hist) A. & P. Tea Co. v. Supermarket Corp. (JWB Class) [398 bytes]
- (hist) EB: Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc., 575 F.2d 1152 (1978) [393 bytes]
- (hist) P. 125, line 8 [390 bytes]
- (hist) P. 244, line -11 [382 bytes]
- (hist) P. 532, line 12 [381 bytes]
- (hist) South Corp. v. U.S., 690 F.2d 1368 (1982) [377 bytes]
- (hist) P. 534, Equation 11.52 [373 bytes]
- (hist) P. 662, line 8 [371 bytes]
- (hist) P. 245, line 8 [365 bytes]
- (hist) P. 167, lines -4,-3 and -2 [358 bytes]
- (hist) THE PATENT DOCUMENT [354 bytes]
- (hist) 2/4/11 (Robins) [335 bytes]
- (hist) P. 571, line 21 [332 bytes]
- (hist) Kemnetz: GE Turbine Case & Catheter Case 04/13/2011 [322 bytes]
- (hist) Mar. 23rd: In re Baxter Travenol Labs. 952 F.2d 388 C.A.Fed.,1991. - Andrew McBride [315 bytes]
- (hist) P. 159, Exercise 4.27, Figure 4.33 [310 bytes]
- (hist) P. 403, line -7 [310 bytes]
- (hist) 2/7/11 (Robins) [304 bytes]
- (hist) P. 493, Fig. 11.4 [303 bytes]
- (hist) P. 142, Figure 4.16 [292 bytes]
- (hist) P. 559, line -4 [290 bytes]
- (hist) P. 205, lines -7 and -9 [287 bytes]
- (hist) P. 128, Equation 4.8 [285 bytes]
- (hist) P. 590, line 16 [280 bytes]
- (hist) P. 223, line 4 [275 bytes]
- (hist) P. 664, line 1 [272 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 4/11/2011 (Fernando Rodriguez) [272 bytes]
- (hist) P. 156, Exercise 4.22 [268 bytes]
- (hist) Kschlax:Hw [268 bytes]
- (hist) P. 89, line -7 [267 bytes]
- (hist) P. 534, Equation 11.51 [266 bytes]
- (hist) P. 525, Equation 11.44 [261 bytes]
- (hist) P. 197, line -1 [260 bytes]
- (hist) P. 664, line 8 [257 bytes]
- (hist) P. 664, line 4 [257 bytes]
- (hist) P. 516, line -4 [252 bytes]
- (hist) P. 349, caption to Figure 9.16 [252 bytes]
- (hist) PLane's Homework [251 bytes]
- (hist) P. 181, line 16 [248 bytes]
- (hist) P. 525, Equation 11.43 [247 bytes]
- (hist) Class Notes 2/7/2011 (Fernando Rodriguez) [244 bytes]
- (hist) P. 182, line 14 [242 bytes]
- (hist) Other Historical Considerations (RCTA) [241 bytes]
- (hist) Homework Assignments [240 bytes]
- (hist) P. 622, line 9 [239 bytes]
- (hist) P. 105, line 12 [235 bytes]
- (hist) Here is a page for her [234 bytes]
- (hist) P. 515, line 6 [233 bytes]
- (hist) P. 572, Exercise 11.9 [233 bytes]
- (hist) P. 163, line 6 [232 bytes]
- (hist) P. 588, line 2 [232 bytes]
- (hist) P. 164, Equation 5.5 [232 bytes]
- (hist) P. 666, line 5 [230 bytes]
- (hist) P. 190, Exercise 5.13 [227 bytes]
- (hist) P. 288, last line in Table 8.1 [223 bytes]
- (hist) P. 68, line 3 [221 bytes]
- (hist) P. 201, line 16 [221 bytes]
- (hist) P. 247, line -7 [220 bytes]
- (hist) P. 139, Equation 4.14 [219 bytes]
- (hist) Miscellaneous [214 bytes]
- (hist) P. 174, Equation 5.14 [213 bytes]
- (hist) P. 191, Exercise 5.16 [211 bytes]
- (hist) P. 513, line 2 [211 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 1/28 (KyleR) [211 bytes]
- (hist) THE PATENT APPLICATION [211 bytes]
- (hist) P. 220, line -9 [209 bytes]
- (hist) P. 348, line 6 [209 bytes]
- (hist) Abbott timeline (RCTA) [208 bytes]
- (hist) Abbott timeline [208 bytes]
- (hist) P. 348, line 4 [207 bytes]
- (hist) P. 186, line 6 [206 bytes]
- (hist) P. 97, line -3 [204 bytes]
- (hist) P. 125, line 5 [204 bytes]
- (hist) P. 172, line -5 [198 bytes]
- (hist) P. 58, line -3, Equation 2.4 [197 bytes]
- (hist) P. 185, line 2 [197 bytes]
- (hist) D.L. Auld Co. v. Chroma Graphics Corp. (KyleR) [195 bytes]
- (hist) P. 524, line 1 [194 bytes]
- (hist) P. 625, Exercise 12.2, number 6 [190 bytes]
- (hist) Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb, 224 F.2d 530 (1955) analysis [189 bytes]
- (hist) P. 209, line 9 [186 bytes]
- (hist) P. 189, Exercise 5.2, part 2 [183 bytes]
- (hist) P. 188, Exercise 5.1, part 2 [183 bytes]
- (hist) P. 125, line -4 [182 bytes]
- (hist) Quiz Summaries [172 bytes]
- (hist) P. 679, exercise 13.12, number 2 [171 bytes]
- (hist) Homework Assignments Due [169 bytes]
- (hist) P. 539, Figure 11.28 [167 bytes]
- (hist) P. 158, Exercise 4.26, Figure 4.32 [164 bytes]
- (hist) ANTICIPATION [157 bytes]
- (hist) P. 117, Figure 3.5 [153 bytes]
- (hist) 1-28-11 [136 bytes]
- (hist) FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC PRIORITY [136 bytes]
- (hist) My Patent : Rear Derailleur for a Bicycle [131 bytes]
- (hist) UTILITY [89 bytes]
- (hist) Brief of Amicus Curiae Motorola, Inc. in Support of Petitioners 901437068 [81 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief hwong1 [64 bytes]
- (hist) Apr. 4: Equivalence Decision SKH [60 bytes]
- (hist) Cara's Homework [43 bytes]
- (hist) Quanta Brief - Karch [39 bytes]
- (hist) Thisisatest [37 bytes]
- (hist) PLane's Reading Notes [34 bytes]
- (hist) Goodwine Class Notes [34 bytes]
- (hist) Homework 4 (due Wednesday 9)~jnosal [26 bytes]
- (hist) Metallizing Engineering v Kenyon Karch [22 bytes]
- (hist) Bonito Karch [19 bytes]
- (hist) Case 5: Thunderdome [17 bytes]
- (hist) Case 5: Something or Other [16 bytes]
- (hist) Cara's hw [14 bytes]
- (hist) You better come say hi after class... [7 bytes]