User:Ebingle

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Revision as of 11:52, 29 April 2011 by Ebingle (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

My Selected US Patent

  • Patent 4417745: Folding Bicycle
    • Date issued: November 29, 1983
  • The idea behind this invention was to create a bicycle that could be easily folded into a compact shape, and thus carried easily onto a bus or train. The invention is a 10 speed, large-wheeled bicycle which can be compacted to 36"x36"x12" in size. The bike can be easily folded in approximately thirty seconds without the use of any tools. I found this patent interesting because I like to bike, and the mechanics behind successfully folding a bicycle are intriguing. Also, I think it will be interesting to explore other inventions involving compact bicycles to compare the differences. I found the patent while searching the "Patentstorm" website; here is the link: [1]. The patent can also be found on Google Patents: [2].

Case Notes

Non-obvious Subject Matter: Section 102

BONITO BOATS V. THUNDER CRAFT, 489 U.S. 141 (1989)

HOTCHKISS v. GREENWOOD, 52 U.S. 11 (1850)

A. & P. TEA CO. v. SUPERMARKET CORP., 340 U.S. 147 (1950)

LYON v. BAUSCH & LOMB, 224 F.2d 530 (1955)

EB: GRAHAM v. JOHN DEERE, 383 U.S. 1 (1966)

EB: US v. ADAMS, 383 U.S. 39 (1966)

EB: ANDERSON'S BLACK ROCK, INC. v. PAVEMENT CO., 396 U.S. 57 (1969)

EB: KSR INTERNATIONAL CO. v. TELEFLEX, INC., 550 U.S. 398 (2007)

Patentable Subject Matter: Section 101

EB: GOTTSCHALK v. BENSON, 409 U.S. 63 (1972)

EB: DIAMOND v. DIEHR, 450 U.S. 175 (1981)

EB:ARRHYTHMIA RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. CORAZONIX CORP., 958 F.2d 1053 (1992)

EB: STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CS. v. SIGNATURE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 149 F.3d 1368 (1998)

EB: BILSKI v. KAPPOS, 130 S.Ct. 3218 (2010)

Statutory Bars

EB: EGBERT v. LIPPMANN, 104 U.S. 333 (1881)

EB: Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co., Inc., 153 F.2d 516 (1946)

Infringement/Doc. of Equivalents

EB:Warner-Jenkinson Company v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 US 17 (1997)

In Class Clarification of Doc. of Equivalents

EB: My Example for Doctrine of Equivalents

EB: Patent Prosecution Process: Notes Wednesday, April 6th

EB: Patent Prosecution Process (Part II): Notes Friday, April 8th

Written Documentation/New Matter

EB: Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar (1991)

EB: TurboCare Div. of Demag Delaval Turbomachinery Corp. v. General Elec. Co., 264 F.3d 1111 (2001)

Patent Exhaustion

EB: Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008)

Miscellaneous

EB: i4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp., 598 F.3d 831 (2010)

EB: Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc., 575 F.2d 1152 (1978)

EB: H.H. Robertson, Co. v. United Steel Deck, Inc., 820 F.2d 384 (1987)

Homework

EB: Friday, January 28: Non-obvious Analysis of My Patent (The Folding Bicycle)

EB: Friday, February 4: Obviousness v. Non-obviousness of Adams Battery

EB: Wednesday, February 9: Edit of Nonobvious Wikipage

EB: Wednesday, March 23: "Printed Publication"

EB: Friday, April 29: Quanta v. LGE Brief Summary