Homework 9, due April 16.

Due Wednesday, April 16, 2008.
Post Reply
goodwine
Site Admin
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
Contact:

Homework 9, due April 16.

Post by goodwine »

For all the problems consider the following block diagram.
  • Image
  1. Let
    • Image
    1. Determine a lead compensator, C(s), so that the root locus goes through the point s=-2+2i. What is the gain (k value) corresponding to that point? By considering only the dominant second order poles, predict the rise time, the settling time and the percent overshoot. Use the matlab step() command to verify your predictions. Explain any differences. You may use matlab to verify your computations, but you must do all the computations by hand for full credit.
    2. Repeat the problem, but have the root locus go through the point s=-2+1.75i.
  2. Let
    • Image
    Determine a lead compensator, C(s), so that the root locus goes through the point s=-2+3i. What is the gain (k value) corresponding to that point? By considering only the dominant second order poles, predict the rise time, the settling time and the percent overshoot. Use the matlab step() command to verify your predictions. Explain any differences.
  3. For all three cases above, use the final value theorem to verify the steady state value of the response of the system to a unit step input. It should correspond to the value that the response is converging to in the plot from the matlab step() command.
Last edited by goodwine on Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
rhorning

Post by rhorning »

Concerning Problem 1, part b, isn't s= -1 + i already a pole? Doesn't the root locus automatically go through the pole, or is that the point?
goodwine
Site Admin
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
Contact:

Post by goodwine »

rhorning wrote:Concerning Problem 1, part b, isn't s= -1 + i already a pole? Doesn't the root locus automatically go through the pole, or is that the point?
Ack, sorry. Those numbers are messed up. I'll fix it right now.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
goodwine
Site Admin
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
Contact:

Problem 2

Post by goodwine »

Someone asked me:
For problem 2 on the homework, I get that it's an undamped wave because the poles are on the real axis. If that's the case, should I just describe that instead of finding the rise time, settling time and percent overshoot?
The point of the problem is to design a compensator so that it doesn't do that any more. For the compensated system, what is the rise time, etc.?
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
Post Reply

Return to “AME 30315, Homework 9”