Homework 2, due September 15, 2006.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
- Contact:
Homework 2, due September 15, 2006.
Complete 8 of the problems on page 67 of the course text. Subproblems (a)-(i) of problem 9 can be considered separate problems.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
question 1
For problem 1 of the homework, the form of the equation fits the criteria for using the Riccati equation.
Following through the notes starting on page 57, a function S(x) is introduced to mold the equation into the format of eq'n 2.15 to be solved with an integrating factor.
The problem I'm running into is that in order to find this integrating factor, the new "P(x)" term as seen in equation 2.15 consists of
(2P(x)S(x)+Q(x)) (see eq'n 2.31), and we do not know S(x) to be able to integrate it w.r.t x. How do we know what S(x) is?
Following through the notes starting on page 57, a function S(x) is introduced to mold the equation into the format of eq'n 2.15 to be solved with an integrating factor.
The problem I'm running into is that in order to find this integrating factor, the new "P(x)" term as seen in equation 2.15 consists of
(2P(x)S(x)+Q(x)) (see eq'n 2.31), and we do not know S(x) to be able to integrate it w.r.t x. How do we know what S(x) is?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
- Contact:
Re: question 1
The difficulty with the approach is that you have to know an S(x) a priori. In other words, given any solution, the book presents a method to find a general solution. Off the top of my head, I don't see a way to find such an S(x) except to guess.irish1 wrote:For problem 1 of the homework, the form of the equation fits the criteria for using the Riccati equation.
Following through the notes starting on page 57, a function S(x) is introduced to mold the equation into the format of eq'n 2.15 to be solved with an integrating factor.
The problem I'm running into is that in order to find this integrating factor, the new "P(x)" term as seen in equation 2.15 consists of
(2P(x)S(x)+Q(x)) (see eq'n 2.31), and we do not know S(x) to be able to integrate it w.r.t x. How do we know what S(x) is?
The other option is to try to find an integrating factor.
If anyone has completed this problem and wants to at least indicate the approach they used, they may do so.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: 376 Fitzpatrick
- Contact:
Re: question 1
Well, I just figured it out. S(x) is just about as simple as it can get and is "guessable."goodwine wrote:The difficulty with the approach is that you have to know an S(x) a priori. In other words, given any solution, the book presents a method to find a general solution. Off the top of my head, I don't see a way to find such an S(x) except to guess.irish1 wrote:For problem 1 of the homework, the form of the equation fits the criteria for using the Riccati equation.
Following through the notes starting on page 57, a function S(x) is introduced to mold the equation into the format of eq'n 2.15 to be solved with an integrating factor.
The problem I'm running into is that in order to find this integrating factor, the new "P(x)" term as seen in equation 2.15 consists of
(2P(x)S(x)+Q(x)) (see eq'n 2.31), and we do not know S(x) to be able to integrate it w.r.t x. How do we know what S(x) is?
The other option is to try to find an integrating factor.
If anyone has completed this problem and wants to at least indicate the approach they used, they may do so.
Bill Goodwine, 376 Fitzpatrick