Egbert v. Lippmann (901422128)
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Read for 2/18/11
Reading Notes
- Case decided in 1881 by the CAFC
- Alleged infringement of reissued patent
- Patent was issued to Samuel Barnes in 1866 and reissued to Frances Barnes in 1873
- Specifications of reissue for an improvement of corset springs
- Bill alleges that Barnes was the original inventor of the improvement covered by the reissued patent
- Also had not been for more than two years in public use or sale
- Answer takes issue to the above and denies infringement
- Circuit Court dismissed the bill
- Evidence demonstrates the infringement of the second claim
- Have to determine if it had been publicly used
- Evidence relies mainly on testimony of lady Barnes
- Invented the improvement between January and May 1855 because of her complaints
- These she wore and he agrees were the same as the reissued patent
- Explained to another friend in 1863 how they were used and showed them her pair
- Must decide if this is public use within the statute
- Using the principles they believe that her wearing them constitutes a public use
- Imposed no obligation of secrecy or restrictions
- The invention was complete at the time he presented them to her
- By the time he applied eleven years later the steels were in universal use
Statutory Bans
- Can't infringe if the subject matter had been publicly used for more than two years prior to application of the original patent
- Act of 1836 ruled if this is the case a patent is invalid
- Three clarifications
- To constitute public use it is not necessary that more than one be publicly used
- It does not depend on how many people know of its use
- Some inventions may only be used where they cannot be seen by the public eye
- Public use is evidence of abandonment (Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.)
Dissenting Judge
- Act of 1836 has a condition that is basically not clear
- If use by others without inventors consent is not public it will defeat but with his consent it must be public to do so
- The word public is very important
- He says that giving one copy to one woman where no one else could see it or knew about it should not count at public