Hotchkiss v. Greenwood SKH

From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Summary

  • Patent for a process of making knobs for doors and cabinets
  • Claimed novelty for material
  • Nothing new about door knobs or the shanks/axels to turn the latch
  • Ultimately arguing about jury instructions
    • questions of law vs. questions of fact
  • Burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show patent is not valid

Decision

  • Decided there was nothing other than substitution of material
  • Patent is not valid because nothing was invented

Dissent

  • Emphasized making combinations that do something "better," "cheaper," or "new."
  • Does not matter if it was obvious, as long as something was made better