User contributions for Kyle Tennant

29 April 2011

• 14:4114:41, 29 April 2011 diff hist +43‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Homeworks current
• 14:4114:41, 29 April 2011 diff hist +385‎ Quanta Brief: Tennant ‎No edit summary current
• 14:3314:33, 29 April 2011 diff hist +1,013‎ N Quanta Brief: Tennant ‎ Created page with "Brief of Amicus Curiae Motorola, Inc. in Support of Petitioners 2007 WL 3440936 *Motorola supports the petitioners (Quanta). *Court precedent establishes that the licensed sale..."
• 14:1514:15, 29 April 2011 diff hist +27‎ Here in list of arguments in Quanta ‎No edit summary

27 April 2011

• 15:4215:42, 27 April 2011 diff hist +144‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Infringement

20 April 2011

• 15:3215:32, 20 April 2011 diff hist +2,244‎ N Case 32: i4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp. (2010) ‎ Created page with "i4i creates custom software for other businesses. They hold a patent for an XML editor; Microsoft has included XML editing features in its Office suite (specifically Word) since ..." current
• 15:0715:07, 20 April 2011 diff hist +59‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Infringement

11 April 2011

• 14:0214:02, 11 April 2011 diff hist +679‎ N Case 31: TurboCare Div. of Demag Delaval Turbomachinery Corp. v. General Elec. Co. (2001) ‎ Created page with "TurboCare holds a patent for a shaft sealing system for fluid turbines. The District Court held one claim invalid and that GE did not infringe on the design. The CAFC upheld the ..." current
• 13:5513:55, 11 April 2011 diff hist +1,547‎ N Case 30: Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar (1991) ‎ Created page with "In this CAFC case, Mahurkar filed a design application for a double-lumen catheter. He also submitted for a Canadian Industrial Design using the same images and some additional t..." current
• 12:5512:55, 11 April 2011 diff hist +9‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Infringement
• 12:5512:55, 11 April 2011 diff hist +218‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Infringement

4 April 2011

• 14:4114:41, 4 April 2011 diff hist −1‎ Homework 9: In-Class Case Study ‎No edit summary current
• 14:4114:41, 4 April 2011 diff hist +2,776‎ N Homework 9: In-Class Case Study ‎ Created page with "The patent holder claims that we, Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., infringed upon two of their patent designs, both for compressor bleed air control apparatuses and methods. One patent..."
• 14:4014:40, 4 April 2011 diff hist +40‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Homeworks

3 April 2011

• 17:0217:02, 3 April 2011 diff hist +606‎ Doctrine of Equivalents Case List ‎No edit summary

31 March 2011

• 19:1019:10, 31 March 2011 diff hist +614‎ N Homework 8: Clear Example of Doctrine of Equivalents ‎ Created page with "Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.<br/> 264 F.3d 1326 <br/> CAFC, Kansas (2001) Kustom Signals held a patent for a multimode traffic radar system which will show eit..." current
• 18:5118:51, 31 March 2011 diff hist +61‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Homeworks

25 March 2011

• 15:3515:35, 25 March 2011 diff hist +980‎ N Case 28: Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. (1950) ‎ Created page with "Linde Air accused Graver of infringing their patent for electric welding processes and the flux used in them. The District Court held some claims invalid and others valid and inf..." current
• 15:0215:02, 25 March 2011 diff hist +1,692‎ N Case 27: CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation (2002) ‎ Created page with "The CAFC heard a case in which Life Fitness, a division of Brunswick, was accused of infringing a patent held by CCS Fitness for an elliptical trainer. The CCS patent claimed a "..." current
• 13:4613:46, 25 March 2011 diff hist +155‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Case Reading Summaries

23 March 2011

• 03:5703:57, 23 March 2011 diff hist +873‎ N Homework 7: In re Hall Supplementary Case ‎ Created page with "In 1989, the District Court heard American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. American Standard held the patent for a bone implant coating that induced bone ingrowth by virtue of its p..." current
• 00:4500:45, 23 March 2011 diff hist +50‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Homeworks

21 March 2011

• 15:2215:22, 21 March 2011 diff hist +632‎ N Case 26: In re Hall (1986) ‎ Created page with "In this case, Foldi, a German scientist, wrote a thesis and submitted it to Freiburg University in Germany concerning subject matter pertinent to a patent application. The thesis..." current
• 14:3714:37, 21 March 2011 diff hist +1,516‎ N Case 25: In re Carlson (1992) ‎ Created page with "The CAFC here ruled on whether an invention made in a foreign country constituted prior art and thus rendered a design by Carlson for a dual-compartment bottle obvious in light o..." current
• 13:4813:48, 21 March 2011 diff hist +9‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Statutory Bars
• 13:4813:48, 21 March 2011 diff hist +337‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Statutory Bars
• 13:4413:44, 21 March 2011 diff hist +17,969‎ N Homework 6: Patentable Subject Matter Paper ‎ Created page with "In order to determine the patentability of a process, let’s first turn to the formal definition of a process offered in Section 100(b) of the U.S. Code under Title 35: “a ‘..." current
• 13:4213:42, 21 March 2011 diff hist +34‎ Homework 5: Nonobviousness Paper ‎No edit summary current
• 13:4113:41, 21 March 2011 diff hist +13,462‎ N Homework 5: Nonobviousness Paper ‎ Created page with "The U.S. Code sets forth a series of qualifications concerning patents, patentability, and all that these terms imply in a series of sections under Title 35. The guidelines for n..."
• 13:3813:38, 21 March 2011 diff hist +57‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Homeworks

11 March 2011

• 17:2317:23, 11 March 2011 diff hist +2‎ Notes from 3/11/2011 ‎No edit summary current
• 17:2217:22, 11 March 2011 diff hist +5‎ Notes from 3/11/2011 ‎No edit summary
• 17:2217:22, 11 March 2011 diff hist +1,762‎ N Notes from 3/11/2011 ‎ Created page with "Claims: *most important part of a patent *define boundaries of property right <br/> Interpreting the claims for 2 reasons #with respect to the prior art to determine validity #..."
• 17:1517:15, 11 March 2011 diff hist 0‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Class Notes
• 17:1417:14, 11 March 2011 diff hist +665‎ Notes form 3/11/2011 ‎No edit summary current
• 16:5716:57, 11 March 2011 diff hist +827‎ N Notes form 3/11/2011 ‎ Created page with "Claims: *most important part of a patent *define boundaries of property right <br/> Interpreting the claims for 2 reasons #with respect to the prior art to determine validity #w..."
• 16:5216:52, 11 March 2011 diff hist +51‎ User:Kyle Tennant ‎ →‎Statutory Bars
• 03:3303:33, 11 March 2011 diff hist +3,266‎ N Case 13: Bilski v. Kappos (2010) ‎ Created page with "The point of the wording of patent laws is to provide a wide scope under which patentable inventions can fall. The Court has designated three exceptions to these principles: laws..." current

10 March 2011

• 23:0523:05, 10 March 2011 diff hist +2,136‎ Case 10: Diamond v. Diehr (1981) ‎No edit summary current
• 21:1821:18, 10 March 2011 diff hist +1,047‎ N Case 10: Diamond v. Diehr (1981) ‎ Created page with "Diamond and his crew filed a petition for a patent which would mold raw rubber into precise shapes. This process had been difficult in the past because of the uncertainty surroun..."
• 20:5620:56, 10 March 2011 diff hist +1,419‎ Case 9: Gottschalk v. Benson (1972) ‎No edit summary current
• 18:5218:52, 10 March 2011 diff hist +1,169‎ Case 9: Gottschalk v. Benson (1972) ‎No edit summary
• 06:0106:01, 10 March 2011 diff hist +611‎ Case 9: Gottschalk v. Benson (1972) ‎No edit summary
• 04:5504:55, 10 March 2011 diff hist +635‎ N Case 9: Gottschalk v. Benson (1972) ‎ Created page with "Benson et al. filed for a patent for converting binary coded decimal numbers into pure binary numbers in a method not specific to a certain application or apparatus. They attempt..."
• 03:1703:17, 10 March 2011 diff hist +57‎ N Case 19: Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) ‎ moved Case 19: Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) to Case 20: Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) current
• 03:1703:17, 10 March 2011 diff hist 0‎ m Case 20: Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) ‎ moved Case 19: Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) to Case 20: Pfaff vs. Wells Electronics (1998) current
• 03:1603:16, 10 March 2011 diff hist +57‎ N Case 18: UMC Electronics Co. v. U.S. (1987) ‎ moved Case 18: UMC Electronics Co. v. U.S. (1987) to Case 19: UMC Electronics Co. v. U.S. (1987) current
• 03:1603:16, 10 March 2011 diff hist 0‎ m Case 19: UMC Electronics Co. v. U.S. (1987) ‎ moved Case 18: UMC Electronics Co. v. U.S. (1987) to Case 19: UMC Electronics Co. v. U.S. (1987) current
• 03:1603:16, 10 March 2011 diff hist +54‎ N Case 17: Lough v. Brunswick Corp. (1996) ‎ moved Case 17: Lough v. Brunswick Corp. (1996) to Case 18: Lough v. Brunswick Corp. (1996) current
• 03:1603:16, 10 March 2011 diff hist 0‎ m Case 18: Lough v. Brunswick Corp. (1996) ‎ moved Case 17: Lough v. Brunswick Corp. (1996) to Case 18: Lough v. Brunswick Corp. (1996) current