Hotchkiss v. Greenwood SKH: Difference between revisions
From Bill Goodwine's Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Summary''' | |||
*Patent for a process of making knobs for doors and cabinets | *Patent for a process of making knobs for doors and cabinets | ||
*Claimed novelty for material | *Claimed novelty for material | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
*Ultimately arguing about jury instructions | *Ultimately arguing about jury instructions | ||
**questions of law and questions of fact | **questions of law and questions of fact | ||
** | |||
''' | |||
Decision''' | |||
*Decided there was nothing other than substitution of material | |||
*Patent is not valid because nothing with invented | |||
Revision as of 17:07, 26 January 2011
Summary
- Patent for a process of making knobs for doors and cabinets
- Claimed novelty for material
- Nothing new about door knobs or the shanks/axels to turn the latch
- Ultimately arguing about jury instructions
- questions of law and questions of fact
Decision
- Decided there was nothing other than substitution of material
- Patent is not valid because nothing with invented
